Thursday, March 28, 2013

Book Review: George R. R. Martin's "A Clash of Kings"




          A Clash of Kings begins where A Game of Thrones ended. Winter truly is coming, and, instead of using autumn to prepare for its onset, the people of Westeros watch their crops burn and their fields turn to ash. The Seven Kingdoms are at war. Across the continent, battles rage and lords fall, or are captured and held for ransom. Peace seems unlikely, as each faction believes its cause will lead to victory and, for many, peace entails certain death. In the towns and castles, peasants starve, while noble lords and ladies continue to feast.
          While unrest rules in the Seven Kingdoms, asserting a power that not even noble pedigrees cannot assuage, Wildlings and other forces continue to gather in the North, and the Night’s Watch prepares to defend the realm. In Essos, Daenerys Targaryen seeks a means to return to her kingdom and mount the throne that she believes is hers by right. To do so, she must navigate the overt threats to her safety, and the subtle dance of plots to weaken her power.
          A Clash of Kings is notably darker than its prequel. War, it seems, has bred crueler men and women. Swords are quickly raised and blood shed, where before it was wits that clashed and pride that was wounded. Commanders condone cruelty and wantonness in the men who serve them, as long as that cruelty demoralizes their enemies.
          Magic seems to be returning to the world, and not all of it is used for good purpose. Characters have prophetic dreams, sorcerers perform feats that could either be magical expression or well-executed ruse, and the gods or demonic forces have begun to speak to and through individuals who care to listen.
          The cast of characters has expanded, in the second installment of A Song of Ice and Fire. The size and scope of Martin’s imagined realm begins to show its girth to the reader. New perspectives have been added to account for more aspects of the story and to replace characters that no longer dwell in the land of the living. Characters’ personalities have become more defined; it is easier to identify which characters are crueler and eviler, kinder and more innocent, dutiful and untrustworthy, than it was in A Game of Thrones. Still, certain characters are harder to figure out, especially those who are only seen through the perspectives of focal characters.
          Perhaps, this continually expanding cast of characters is one of the novels greatest flaws. Sometimes, remembering the actions and personalities of fringe characters becomes difficult, particularly when sons and brothers bear similar names and titles, but owe their allegiances to different lords.
           The increasing divergence of storylines also proves problematic to the novel’s ending. A reader can feel that the tale has come to a conclusion, as one character’s story comes to a close, but, there are still other stories that have to be finished. The effect is that the novel’s denouement feels a bit too drawn out. However, the various storylines also give Martin an effective way to build suspense. He can conclude a chapter with a cliffhanger, and then leave that tale to visit another perspective and facet of his story. The effect sucks readers in, and makes them want to keep reading. The divergent storylines also allow readers to escape one tale for a little while, and enjoy the beauty of another.
          A Clash of Kings is equal in size to A Game of Thrones, and it is equally enchanting. The tale draws you in, despite some slow moments. It is certainly worth the investment reading it, and the ending (to all its storylines) will leave you wanting more, and force you to turn to the third book in the series.
JCM
28 March 2013

No comments:

Post a Comment